Contact
Welcome to mBlog
Macworld publishes first benchmarks of new iMacs!
Posted by Michal, motionVFX Team
May 4, 2011, at 11:02 PM

Just yesterday Apple released the updated line of iMacs and Macworld already published the first round of benchmark of the new desktops. Macworld Lab owns all four standard configuration models and they posted results for the $1999 27" iMac. According to them the results do not disappoint, with the new iMac besting the previous generation of standard-configuration iMacs. The new quad-core 3.1 GHz i5 iMac outperformed the previous high-end model (a quad-core 2.8 GHz i5 iMac), in every test - it was 16% faster in the Speedmark 6.5 test and 22% faster in Macworld's iTunes encode test.



 

Less of a difference in performance can be observed while comparing the new system to last year's BTO models: "Just two Speedmark points separate the new 3.1GHz Core i5 iMac from the 2.93GHz Core i7 quad-core BTO iMac. The 2.93GHz model, like all 2010 iMacs, does not use Sandy Bridge processors, but it does support both Hyper Threading and Turbo Boost. In applications such as Cinebench and MathematicaMark, which can take advantage of eight virtual cores, the 2.93GHz BTO iMac outperformed the new 3.1GHz iMac".

As written by tuaw.com, when compared to a dual-core 3.6 GHz i5 BTO iMac from 2010 the current 3.1 Ghz iMac edged out its older relative by 14% in overall performance and finished tasks in Mathematica (an app that makes use of multiple processing cores, up to 67% faster). In many cases, however, the faster clock speed of the older machine helped it complete certain tasks more quickly.

Below you can see the new 2011 Thunderbolt iMac playing Full HD movies on three screens simultaneously without any hiccup:
 


Source: http://www.pcworld.comhttp://www.cultofmac.comhttp://www.cultofmac.com

Comments:
Phillip
May 5, 2011
Coool, the benchmarks I am waiting for is the performance gained when editing in Apple Motion - how much of a gain will there be in the new i7 iMac over the i5 (RAM and graphics card aside)
Reply
Szymon Masiak
May 5, 2011
The main difference will be in graphic card while we are talking about Apple Motion - Motion is GPU type of software. Faster GPU means faster renders.
Phillip
May 5, 2011
I wonder what difference there is between the Radeon HD 6970M 1GB and the Radeon HD 6770M 512MB.
or would it be better to up the RAM from 4GB to 8GB
Reply
Szymon Masiak
May 5, 2011
Major difference. Radeon HD is the best card for Motion and you'll see significant difference between those 2 models. If I would have to choose, I would choose better graphic card than amount of RAM.
last comments
sucks that there is no 60 FPS. Topic: Blackmagic Design announces... the Blackmagic Cinema Camera! 2.5K for $2,995!
WOW ! Topic: Apple to revolutionize online maps - its new app will "blow your head off"!
Hardcore! Nice :) Topic: Canon 7D: Ready For Anything!
I am really happy this came out. And well, I hope mflare & mburn can be added to Premiere Pro CS6 soon. Topic: Video introduction to Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 and what's new in After Effects!









gallery


Contact
Copyright © 2012 MotionVFX. All rights reserved.